Syrian Father and Son Interviewed About Boy’s Appearance in FAKE Chemical Attack Video

ThereAreNoSunglasses

Earlier the White Helmets, a Western-backed NGO known for its ties with terrorist groups, released a video showing alleged victims of the false-flag chemical attack in Douma. The US and its allies used the video as a pre-text to conduct a missile strike on Syria.

The Russia 24 TV channel released an exclusive interview on April 18 with a boy, who participated in filming a fake video, as evidence of the false-flag chemical attack in Douma by the White Helmets. In the interview, Hassan Diab says that he and his mother heard loud voices on the street, urging everyone to rush to the hospitals. When Hassan entered the hospital, unknown people grabbed him, poured water on him and then put him with other patients.

“We were in the basement. Mom told me that today we don’t have anything to eat and that we will eat tomorrow…

View original post 377 more words

Advertisements

Theresa #May’s Change of Heart on #Syria Strikes: Nothing to Explain It Except a Family Chat!

Theresa May’s husband Philip has a glaring conflict of interest through his work at one of the world’s largest and most powerful financial institutions, the Capital Group, which controls a stunning $1.4 trillion in assets, and is a major investor in Syrian strike weapons manufacturers.

Source: Theresa May’s Change of Heart on Syria Strikes: Nothing to Explain It Except a Family Chat

Babies for Sale- The Adoption Profit Motive

“So merely throwing money at adoption appears to increase agency profits but not adoption rates.
And the proof of the pudding is successful outcomes for these children and a decrease in actual abuse but where are these measured ?
It appears even adoption breakdowns when these children are forced to re enter care are not being properly monitored.”

finolamoss

baby sellers

The stuff of barbarism- a baby torn from a loving mother for ever.

But it’s just another day for the Social worker walking briskly towards a ward, baby carrier on arm to whisk a baby to a stranger approved by the state.

Job done, baby protected, agency paid.

How more easily could at least £27,000 be earned than from the finding of parents for a new born baby ?

A distasteful impersonal ‘transaction’ sanctioned by law, happening daily in UK hospitals only.

The horror unseen, the damage unknown, the social obscenity not even discussed.

The mother presumed such a monster her own baby needs protection, so deserves her fate

But does she ?

Her husband failed to attend an Anger Management Course because of LA cuts, she’s has a mental disorder, drug/drink issues or learning disability or simply had relationships with violent men in the past or herself has just…

View original post 1,353 more words

Magical sparkle powers, secure accommodation and consent

suesspiciousminds

These are two intricate judgments about the same child, where two different and unusual points of law collide.

  1. For a while now, because there are not enough Secure Accommodation beds for the children who need to be placed in them, the High Court has been asked (and is often granting)  approval for the child to be placed in a unit that is NOT approved for Secure Accommodation and giving all of the powers for the child’s liberty to be restricted, using the Court’s inherent jurisdiction – or what I like to call magical sparkle powers. (I think this is a public enquiry waiting to happen – there are very good reasons – google Pindown – for why Parliament set up a very restrictive statutory regime for how children can be deprived of their liberty, with training and inspection regimes to safeguard those children. Others take a pragmatic view that these…

View original post 3,891 more words

SECTION 57 AND FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY: A HARD LINE TAKEN: THREE RECENT CASES

Here the High Court then gave some useful guidance on a court’s task in dealing with an application under section 57.

“38. The first stage for the court when considering an application under section 57 is to decide whether, on a balance of probabilities, the defendant has established that the claimant has been fundamentally dishonest in relation to the primary claim or a related claim. The judge was not satisfied that this was the case. On the facts and the evidence presented to him, it cannot be said that this was not a decision open to him. The issue of dishonesty is akin to a jury question. In the case of a civil trial before a judge alone, it is a matter for the trial judge who has seen and heard all the evidence unless some material flaw in approach or his analysis can be identified.”

Kerry Underwood

The whole issue of Section 57 is dealt with at length in my book – Qualified One-Way Costs Shifting, Section 57 and Set-Off– Available here for £15 including P&P

There have been three recent and important High Court decisions in relation to how the fundamental dishonesty test under section 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 should be applied.

That section requires a court to dismiss an otherwise valid personal injury claim if the claimant has been fundamentally dishonest in relation to the claim unless the claimant would suffer substantial injustice if the claim was dismissed.

It only applies to cases issued on or after 13 April 2015 and covers counterclaims as well.

The full text of section 57 and the Explanatory Notes are set out at the end of this piece.

In Ivey v Genting Casinos Limited (trading as Crockfords Club) [2017] 3 WLR 1212

the…

View original post 3,237 more words

How Arrogance Blinds the West to Their Historic Decline

“Frankopan also maintains Europe has never had much to offer in the way of natural resources or intellectual innovation (Christianity has always suppressed knowledge and progress). In 800 AD, Mesopotamia was the wealthiest region in the world, with Baghdad viewed as the global center of trade and learning. During this period, Europe’s most important resource was slaves, with Dublin, Mainz, Utrecht and Venice serving as major trafficking centers for kidnapped women and children.

All this changed with the conquest of the New World, the enslavement of Native Americans and Africans, and the flow of silver and gold back to Europe. This illicit capture of mineral wealth and human beings enabled Europe to developed highly specialized skills in violence and conquest. They no longer needed to produce their own wealth because they could use their military prowess to steal it from other regions.

Over time, the economic decline of the West has eroded their military capability to the point they can no longer win wars.

As in Rome, obscene income inequality is one of the main indicators of an empire in decline.”

The Most Revolutionary Act

Peter Frankopan – The Silk Roads

Directed by Justin Hardy (2017)

Film Review

This documentary, based on historian Peter Frankopan’s best selling book Silk Roads, explores the Western trait of putting their own interests at the center of their world and possessing no interest or capacity to understand other cultures.

Typically both Europeans and Americans believe they have a monopoly on “goodness” – that only they can save the world from darkness and suffering. Their ruling elite uses these beliefs to justify invading and occupying third world countries and are surprised when other cultures regard us as smug and arrogant.

According to Frankopan, Europe and the US presently find themselves at the wrong end of global trade routes. Asian countries, especially China, that used to be poor are rich now. Asia provides the vast majority of Western consumer goods and owns most Western debt. Over the last 40 years…

View original post 226 more words

18, 000 Syrian Children have had their Organs Harvested Over the Last 6 Years

Friends of Syria

Reports from the Director-General of the Syrian Coroner’s Office affirm that thousands of Syrian children have had their organs harvested since 2011.

Turkish refugee camps on the border with Syria are identified as prime locations where organ harvesting has been, and is, occurring. Director-General Hossein Noufel recently made the disclosure though United Nation officials have not officially confirmed the findings.

“We have accurate information that over 25,000 surgical operations have been conducted in the refugee camps of the neighbouring countries and in the terrorist-controlled areas in Syria since 2011 to take out the body organs of 18,000 Syrians and sell them in the international black markets.” – Dr. Noufel

Previously, refugees have recounted horror stories about the dire situation inside some of the refugee camps, however the morbid practice is not limited to camps as there are claims organ harvesting is occurring in Urban centres as well.

Speaking to ARA…

View original post 414 more words

#AlJazeera ‘totally refutes’ false claims by pro-Israel lobbyist!

Al Jazeera ‘totally refutes’ false claims by pro-Israel lobbyist | Al Jazeera | 18 April 2018

Al Jazeera Media Network (AJMN) totally refutes false claims by Morton Klein, the president of the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), that al Jazeera was compelled to to ‘cancel’ a yet to be broadcast investigation into the activities of pro-Israel advocacy groups in the United States.

Mr Klein obviously mischaracterizes the subject of the series as the “American Jewish Lobby”, when the investigation is into American pro-Israel organizations (including the ZOA), which work to further the interests of a foreign power on American soil.

AJMN also utterly rejects the abhorrent allegation that the series is “viciously anti-Semitic”. The investigation deals with organizations that influence U.S. Government policy in the Middle East, which is a subject of significant public interest.

It is astonishing that Mr Klein writes about a documentary series that he has not seen in terms that are prejudicial, inaccurate and inflammatory.

He also refers to the UK edition of The Lobby, broadcast in January 2017, which he again misconstrues as being about the “Jewish lobby” in Britain.

This series exposed a campaign by the State of Israel to interfere with domestic politics in the UK, which included covert operations to promote a foreign country’s agenda within Britain’s political parties. In one case, it revealed a plot to “take down” a government minister who was critical of Jewish-only settlements in the West Bank.

The Israeli Ambassador to the UK was forced to apologize to the Foreign Office and the diplomat involved was fired. The investigation also triggered a parliamentary inquiry into foreign interference in British politics.

Pro-Israel advocacy groups in the UK made a series of complaints to the Office of Communications (Ofcom), the quasi-government regulator that ensures fairness and accuracy on British television. Al Jazeera is a signatory and abides by Ofcom’s stringent codes of practice.

The complainants leveled charges of anti-Semitism, bias, unfair editing and infringement of privacy. After an eight months’ investigation, Ofcom’s detailed, 60-page ruling vindicated al Jazeera’s journalism on every count. Each complaint was rejected in full.[1]

The mission of al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit, which produced the two series on pro-Israel advocacy organizations, is to unmask wrongdoing and reveal truths that are being kept from the public.

Recent award-winning investigations uncovered corruption in the Maldives, the criminal gangs that fuel the illegal trade in rhino horn in South Africa, and the unregulated market in military-grade spying equipment.

In 2018, the Unit investigated fraud involving Eastern European oligarchs and produced a heartbreaking documentary into child sexual abuse in British football, which was simultaneously broadcast by Channel 4 Television in the UK.

The journalists in the Investigative Unit are American, British and Australian. They have decades of professional experience at the BBC, MSNBC, ABC, ITN, Channel 4 and Britain’s Sunday Times and Observer. Since its formation in 2011, the Investigative Unit has generated global exclusives that have been described by The New York Times as ‘explosive’ and made front page headlines in USA Today, The Guardian, El Pais and Mail on Sunday.

As a Network, al Jazeera’s independent, high quality journalism is praised all over the world. Last week, al Jazeera English was named Broadcaster of the Year for the second year running at the New York Festivals, where AJMN was honored with 46 awards.

Al Jazeera is committed to independent journalism and reaffirms its belief in media freedom, unhampered by government influence. It considers it deeply unsettling that organizations in the United States are attempting to suppress its output and curtail freedom of speech. Al Jazeera considers such attempts as a form of harassment that threatens the safety of journalists and their ability to perform their professional duties in a secure environment.

AJMN reserves the right to take legal action against anyone who attacks its character and integrity, as well as that of its journalists. Individual members of al Jazeera’s staff also reserve that right.

———————————————-

[1] OFCOM Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin, Issue number 338, 9 October 2017 https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0033/106989/issue-338-br…

-End-


 

#Commonwealth #immigration: ‘National day of shame’: David #Lammy criticises treatment of #Windrush generation – video

‘National day of shame’: David Lammy criticises treatment of Windrush generation – video | Parliament TV | The GUARDIAN | 

Labour MP says situation has come about because of the hostile environment that begun under Theresa May, as he blames a climate of far-right rhetoric. People who came to the UK in the 1950s and 60s are now concerned about whether they have a legal right to remain in the country.

The government has admitted that some people from the Windrush generation had been deported in error, as Theresa May appeared to make a U-turn on the issue

#Perspective #CriticalThinking: #Sheeple: Why You Should Feel Sorry for Them

Sheeple: Why You Should Feel Sorry for Them | Brandon Smith | Alt Market.com | 20 Nov 2013

It is often said there only two kinds of people in this world: those who know, and those who don’t. I would expand on this and say that there are actually three kinds of people: those who know, those who don’t know, and those who don’t care to know. Members of the last group are the kind of people I would characterize as “sheeple.”

Sheeple are members of a culture or society who are not necessarily oblivious to the reality of their surroundings; they may have been exposed to valuable truths on numerous occasions. However, when confronted with facts contrary to their conditioned viewpoint, they become aggressive and antagonistic in their behavior, seeking to dismiss and attack the truth by attacking the messenger and denying reason. Sheeple exist on both sides of America’s false political paradigm, and they exist in all social “classes”. In fact, the “professional class” and the hierarchy of academia are rampant breeding grounds for sheeple; who I sometimes refer to as “intellectual idiots”. Doctors and lawyers, scientists and politicians are all just as prone to the sheeple plague as anyone else; the only difference is that they have a bureaucratic apparatus behind them which gives them a false sense of importance. All they have to do is tow the establishment line, and promote the establishment view.

Of course the common argument made by sheeple is that EVERYONE thinks everyone else is blind to the truth, which in their minds, somehow vindicates their behavior. However, the characteristic that absolutely defines a sheeple is not necessarily a lack of knowledge, but an unwillingness to consider or embrace obvious logic or truth in order to protect their egos and biases from harm. A sheeple’s mindset is driven by self centered motives.

So-called mainstream media outlets go out of their way to reinforce this aggressive mindset by establishing the illusion that sheeple are the “majority” and that the majority perception (which has been constructed by the MSM) is the only correct perception.

Many liberty movement activists have noted recently that there has been a surge in media propaganda aimed at painting the survival, preparedness and liberty cultures as “fringe,” “reactionary,” “extremist,” “conspiracy-minded,” etc. National Geographic’s television show “Doomsday Preppers” appears to have been designed specifically to seek out the worst possible representatives of the movement and parade their failings like a carnival sideshow. Rarely do they give focus to the logical arguments regarding why their subjects become preppers, nor do they normally choose subjects who can explain as much in a coherent manner. This is a very similar tactic used by the establishment media at large-scale protests; they generally attempt to interview the least-eloquent and easiest-to-ridicule person present and make that person a momentary mascot for the entire group and the philosophy they hold dear.

The goal is to give sheeple comfort that they are “normal” and that anyone who steps outside the bounds of the mainstream is “abnormal” and a welcome target for the collective.

It would appear that the life of a sheeple is a life of relative bliss. The whole of the establishment machine seems engineered to make them happy and the rest of us miserable. But is a sheeple’s existence the ideal? Are they actually happy in their ignorance? Are they truly safe within the confines of the system? Here are just a few reasons why you should feel sorry for them.

Sheeple Are Nothing Without The Collective

A sheeple gathers his entire identity from the group. He acts the way he believes the group wants him to act. He thinks the way he believes the group wants him to think. All of his “ideas” are notions pre-approved by the mainstream. All of his arguments and talking points are positions he heard from the media, or academia, and he has never formed an original opinion in his life. Without the group telling him what to do, the average sheeple is lost and disoriented. When cast into a crisis situation requiring individual initiative, he panics or becomes apathetic, waiting for the system to come and save him rather than taking care of himself. Sheeple are so dependent on others for every aspect of their personality and their survival that when faced with disaster, they are the most likely people to curl up and die.

Sheeple Crave Constant Approval From Others

Sheeple are not only reliant on the collective for their identity and their survival; they also need a steady supplement of approval from others in order to function day to day. When a sheeple leaves his home, he is worried about how his appearance is perceived, how his attitude is perceived, how his lifestyle is perceived and how his opinions are perceived. Everything he does from the moment his day begins revolves around ensuring that the collective approves of him. Even his acts of “rebellion” are often merely approved forms of superficial “individualism” reliant on style rather than substance. This approval becomes a kind of emotional drug to which the sheeple is addicted. He will never make waves among the herd or stand out against any aspect of the herd worldview, because their approval sustains and cements his very existence. To take collective approval away from him would be like cutting off a heroin junky’s supplier. To be shunned by the group would destroy him psychologically.

Sheeple Are Incapable Of Original Creativity

Because sheeple spend most of their waking moments trying to appease the collective, they rarely, if ever, have the energy or inclination to create something of their own. Sheeple do not make astonishing works of art. They do not achieve scientific discovery. They do not make history through philosophical or ideological innovation. Instead, they regurgitate the words of others and hijack ideas from greater minds. They remain constant spectators in life, watching change from the bleachers, caught in the tides of time and tossed about like congealed satellites of Pacific Ocean garbage from the after-wash of Fukushima. The destiny of the common sheeple is entirely determined by the outcome of wars and restorations waged by small groups of aware individuals — some of them good, some of them evil.

Sheeple Have No Passion

If you draw all of your beliefs from what the collective deems acceptable, then it is difficult, if not impossible, to become legitimately passionate about them. Sheeple have little to no personal connection to their ideals or principles; so they become mutable, empty and uninspired. They tend to turn toward cynicism as a way to compensate, making fun of everything, especially those who ARE passionate about something. The only ideal that they will fight for is the collective itself, because who they are is so intertwined with the survival of the system. To threaten the concept of the collective is to threaten the sheeple’s existence by extension.

Sheeple Are Useless

The average sheeple does not learn how to be self-reliant because it is considered “abnormal” by the mainstream to be self-reliant. The collective and the state are the provider. They are mother and father. Sheeple have full faith that the system will protect them from any and all harm. When violence erupts, they cower and hide instead of defending themselves and others. When large-scale catastrophe strikes, they either sit idle waiting for the state to save them or they join yet another irrational mob. They do not take proactive measures, because they never felt the need to learn how.

Consider this: Why do the mainstream and the people subject to it care if others prepare for disaster or end their dependency on the establishment? Why are they so desperate to attack those of us who find our own path? If the system is so effective and the collective so correct in its methodology, then individualists are hurting only themselves by walking away, right? But for the sheeple, successfully self-reliant individuals become a constant reminder of their own inadequacies. They feel that if they cannot survive without the system, NO ONE can survive without the system; and they will make sure that individualists never prove otherwise. “You didn’t build that” becomes the sheeple motto, as they scratch and scrape like spoiled children, trying to dismantle the momentum of independent movements and ventures in non-participation.

Sheeple Are Easily Forgotten

To live a life of endless acceptance is to live a life of meaningless obscurity. When one arrives at his deathbed, does he want to reflect on all of his regrets or all of his accomplishments? Most of us would rather find joy than sadness when looking back over our past. For sheeple, though, this will not be possible — for what have they ever done besides conform? What will they have left behind except a world worse off than when they were born? What will they have accomplished, but more pain and struggle for future generations? In the end, what have their lives really been worth?

I cannot imagine a torture more vicious and terrifying than to realize in the face of one’s final days that one wasted his entire life trying to please the plethora of idiots around him, instead of educating them and himself and molding tomorrow for the better. I cannot imagine a punishment more severe than to spend the majority of one’s years as a slave without even knowing it. I cannot imagine an existence more deserving of pity and remorse than that of the sheeple.