“The McKenzie Friend’s enemy is not the court. It is not the litigant-in-person. It should not be a regulatory body, or lawyers on the opposing side. Indeed, the McKenzie friend should have no enemies. Provided they adopt the appropriate balance to assist both the courts and the litigant-in-person, McKenzie friends should be considered assets and not liabilities. (licensed and regulated ones conforming to a code of conduct and carrying indemnity insurance).”
If the enemy of my enemy is my friend, and by that logic, my friend’s enemy is my enemy, what does this have to do with McKenzie friends?
Pause before you conjure up and pretend to give some semblance of an intelligent answer, or nod with a knowing, deep, and meaningful expression on your face, hiding the reality that you have no idea, or care particularly.
The original McKenzie friend was Ian Hanger, (later made Queen’s Counsel, and now a mediator in Queensland, Australia) in the case of McKenzie v McKenzie  3 ALL ER 1034, CA. Mr McKenzie was legally aided, but then legal aid was withdrawn. He could not afford legal representation, but Mr Hanger was prepared to go to court as a professional friend of McKenzie: A McKenzie Friend, to sit behind him, suggest advice based on procedure and the law, and to assist generally. The Judge…
View original post 1,113 more words