HILLSBOROUGH AND WITNESS STATEMENTS 2: THE EARLY MIXING OF FACT AND OPINION

Civil Litigation Brief

The previous post in this series looked at the issues that arose when the solicitors for the police force sent out a missive asking the police officers on the ground for their “comment and impression”.  There was an immediate mixing of factual statements, comment and opinion which the police force then spent years trying to edit.  Here I want to look in detail at the consequences of that initial decision to mix factual and opinion evidence.

THE DANGEROUS MIXING  OF FACTS AND OPINION

The first task should have been to find out precisely what happened. Instead the police force received a maelstrom of views from the officers, many of them not at all favourable to the role that the police paid.

THE FIVE SIMPLE QUESTIONS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ASKED

There were five simple questions that should have been asked and recorded.

The police officers should have been asked;

  1. Where…

View original post 487 more words

Advertisements
This entry was posted in World by truthaholics. Bookmark the permalink.

About truthaholics

| Exposing Truth Behind Media Spin. Truth is not gossip. It's not sensational or even exciting. Truth's reality, fact. Truth's shocking, sad, horrific, frightening and deadly. Controversial issues discussed here so only for those able to digest Truth.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s