#HRA ‘Act for the Act’ to help save your Human Rights!

‘Act for the Act’ to save your human rights ~ Vox Political + AMNESTY UK.

People who have successfully used the Human Rights Act to fight injustices in the United Kingdom are calling on their fellow citizens to help in the struggle to stop the Tories from repealing it – and all you have to do is sign an online letter.

Mark Neary: Mark used the Human Rights Act to bring his autistic son Steven home, after the council wrongly took him away.

Act For The Act was formed to urge Justice Secretary (and well-known non-intellectual) Michael Gove to rethink the Tory plan to scrap the Human Rights Act and replace it with a ‘Bill of Rights’ written by Conservatives with a view towards keeping people down, rather than protecting their freedoms.

The site states: “Without the Human Rights Act, there would have been no second inquest into the 1989 Hillsborough disaster to finally uncover the truth about that dreadful day; no accountability for the family of murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence; and no justice for the victims of black cab rapist John Worboys, who were so badly let down.

“As the stories in our unprecedented, nationwide poster campaign show, every day it protects ordinary people and their families, during what may be the most difficult and distressing time of their lives.

“The Human Rights Act is for people like Jan, diagnosed with MS in 1995, or bereaved mothers Martina, Catherine or Ann. Find out how the Human Rights Act helped them below.

“Any one of us might suddenly find that we need the Human Rights Act’s protections. Now we all need to act to save it by signing the letter and telling Justice Secretary Michael Gove that it is too important to be replaced.”

I have signed the letter.

Will you?


************************************************************************************************

________________________________________________________________________

CLICK HERE TO SIGN:

Our hard won rights are under attack.

ACT FOR THE ACT!

Tell Michael Gove to save the Human Rights Act ~ via @AmnestyUK

________________________________________________________________________

************************************************************************************************

HRA 98


Shao Jiang: Protester says UK now as bad as China over human rights  ~ THE INDEPENDENT.

‘We know that during this state visit the UK has been ignoring human rights in China – now it is ignoring human rights violations in the UK as well.’

Shao Jiang and his wife has spent the day struggling to come to terms with the events of the past 48 hours, haunted by dark memories. His heavy-handed arrest and search of their house was a shock, but the events were also familiar.

The couple fled China after repeated arrests, searches of their home and harassment of their family. Now they are a regular fixture on the London Chinese dissident scene, where they had thought that they would be guaranteed freedom of expression and the right to peaceful protest. “I was protesting peacefully,” he toldThe Independent. “And when I was arrested I couldn’t believe that this country was no longer protecting freedom of expression. It’s just like China now.”

Mr Jiang knew he was likely to be arrested for attempting to disrupt the Chinese leader’s visit. What he didn’t expect was the force used to detain him – and that he would subsequently be re-arrested for abusive behaviour against President Xi Jingping, and that his home would be searched in the middle of the night. His computers were also seized.

“My arrest has brought back memories of my arrests in 1989 when my parents were harassed, and in 1995 when my wife became repressed by the government and they searched our home,” he said. “It feels like it is happening again, but unlike campaigners in China I have been able to speak to a lawyer who can defend my rights. That couldn’t happen in China, my lawyer would be arrested or ‘disappeared’.”

His wife, Johanna Zhang, said the couple were more “positive” now after taking legal advice and again rejected suggestions he was planning to threaten anybody. “He was protesting peacefully,” she said. “I am so nervous when the door knocks now, my first reaction is that it is the police.”

Mr Jiang, who spent the day at home speaking to his legal team, said he hoped his arrest would help to raise the profile of the “fight for human rights in China”. He said: “Today I have been thinking about those 30 ‘disappeared’ lawyers and human rights campaigners in China. We know that during this state visit the UK has been ignoring human rights in China. Now it is ignoring human rights violations in the UK as well.”

Advertisements
This entry was posted in World by truthaholics. Bookmark the permalink.

About truthaholics

| Exposing Truth Behind Media Spin. Truth is not gossip. It's not sensational or even exciting. Truth's reality, fact. Truth's shocking, sad, horrific, frightening and deadly. Controversial issues discussed here so only for those able to digest Truth.

3 thoughts on “#HRA ‘Act for the Act’ to help save your Human Rights!

  1. Reblogged this on UZA – people's courts, forums, & tribunals and commented:
    Without any prejudice to any living people,

    And only so that the trueth may set us free; this post is incorrect for a number of reasons;

    first and foremost, we are laymen who are NOT legal practioners, so who better to explain it, but commoners such as ourselves who have spent years studying this full time in order to find remedy; so, we are going to keep it simple; do not believe us; research it for yourselves; if you wish to read the herein-named Annexures then go to the Annexures on giftoftruthdotwordpress for pdfs; this is also for our international court case before the ITNJ which should be announced in a week or so;

    Firstly, one has to comprehend jurisdictions!!!IT’S ALL ABOUT JURISDICTION!!! IT’S CALLED SUBJECTMATTER JURISDICTION! THE FIRST THING ANY COURT DETERMINES; And there are many, but we will keep it simple; there is the LAW OF THE SEA and the law of the sea and the law of the land;

    LAW OF THE SEA/LAW MERCHANT/ADMIRALTY/CIVIL/COMMERCE ETC; which has it’s origins in PERPETUAL EDICT of HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE/ CURIA/VATICAN/VICAR OF CHRIST ETC.

    Made up of ACTS, STATUTES AND CODES which is NOT LAW, it’s rules which ONLY apply to ‘employees’ such as PERSONS/INDUVIDUALS/CITIZENS/HUMANS and have NO JURISDICTION on the land; period;

    ALLl COURTS currently are operating under the law of the sea; period; a ‘human’ is legally defined as a ‘monster’;

    ALL CAPITALS is a VESSEL and you get plundered by claiming the ALL CAPS NAME; watch a youtube clip called “Meet your Strawman”;

    ACTS are limited jurisdiction servitude rights only!!!!!!!!!!!! Which we the people, who have already established rights as one can find in THE LAW OF THE LAND: ALL UN-ENACTED maxims, canons, precedents, religious texts, customs from ancient times and Old Authorities which applies to “We, the People”; NOT HUMAN;

    We say that the law of the sea operates on our land under ACTS which are only LIMITED JURISDICTION SERVITUDE RIGHTS as opposed to ‘Via’ which is a complete right;
    ACTUS. In the civil law, an act or action. Non tantum verbis, sed etiam actu; not only by words, but also by act. Dig. 46, 8. 5. A species of right of way, consisting in the right of driving cattle, or a carriage, over the land subject to the servitude. Inst.. 2, 3, pr.
    It is sometimes translated a “road,” and included the kind of way termed “iter,” or path. Lord Coke, who adopts the term “actus” from Bracton, defines it a foot and horse way, vulgarly called “pack and prime way;” but distinguishes it from a cart-way. Co.Litt. 56a; Boyden v. Achenbach, 79 N.C. 539.
    In old English law, an act of parliament; a statute. 8 Coke 40.
    A distinction, however, was sometimes made between actus and statutum. Actus parliamenti was an act made by the lords and commons; and it became statutum, when it received the king’s consent. Barring.Obs.St. 46, note b. 54
    VIA. Lat. Way, road.
    In the civil law. Way; a road; a right of way.
    The right of walking, riding, and driving over another’s land. Inst. 2, 3, pr. A species of rural servitude, which included iter (a footpath) and actus, (a driftway.)
    In old English law. A way; a public road; a foot, horse, and cart way. Co. Litt. 56a.

    DRIFTWAY. A road or way over which cattle are driven. Selw.N.P. 1037; Woolr.Ways 1; 2 Hilliard, Abr.Prop. 33; Smith v. Ladd, 41 Me. 314; Swen
    sen v. Marino, 306 Mass. 582, 29 N.E.2d 15, 18, 130 A.L.R. 763.

    VIA ANTIQUA VIA EST TUTA. The old way is the safe way. Manning v. Manning’s Ex’rs, 1 Johns. Ch. (N.Y.) 527, 530.

    VIA PUBLICA. In the civil law. A public way or road, the land itself belonging to the public. Dig. 43, 8, 2, 21.

    We say that these ACTs of PARLIAMENT are LAW of COMMERCE and contracts pertaining ONLY to legal fictions aka SECURED PARTY DEBTORS/BENEFICIARIES with rights and duties as opposed to we, the people who are living Creditors and the Real Trustees and can never be in-debted; refer to Annexure – Memorandum on Law of the Name

    We say that common-law living traditions and CIVIL traditions are contrary jurisdictions and like oil and water cannot mix; refer to 131.Common Law vs Civil Law

    Actus curiae neminem gravabit. An act of the court shall prejudice no man. Jenk.Cent. 118. Where a delay in an action is the act of the court, neither party shall suffer for it.

    We say that through the use of LEGALESE and CAPITIS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA, semantic deceit is used in to create the colour of consent under the colour of law; refer to 120.Annexure – Capitis Diminutio Maxima

    PLAIN-LANGUAGE MOVEMENT. 1. The loosely organized campaign to encourage legal writers and business writers to write clearly and concisely — without legalese — while preserving accuracy and precision. 2. The body of persons involved in this campaign.
    LEGALESE. (lee-g<>-leez). The jargon characteristically used by lawyers, esp. in legal documents
    Can you already see how you have been deceived? To be running around voting for MONSTER RIGHTS which is NOT “We, the People”;

    TO DECEIVE YOU SOME MORE: Your ‘LORD’s have even made a few copies of your ORIGINAL Bill of Rights AND Constitution by ENACTING them and PUBLISHING them! FRAUD!!!
    PUBLISH. To declare or assert, directly or indirectly, by words or actions, that a forged instrument is genuine. People v. Bradford, 84 Cal.App. 707, 258 P. 660, 662.

    AND to RE-VENUE them by GAZETTE into BANKRUPTCY; Yes, the law of the sea operates under BANKRUPTCY and MARITIME SALVAGE LAW;
    GAZETTE. The official publication of the English government, also called the “London Gazette,” It is evidence of acts of state, and of everything done by the king in his political capacity. Orders of adjudication in bankruptcy are required to be published therein; and the production of a copy of the “Gazette,” containing a copy
    of the order of adjudication, is evidence of the fact. Mozley & Whitley.

    We are supposed to have a Public Record; in the law of the sea one REGISTERS, by the law of the land, one makes a record:

    Public record. A record, memorial of some act or transaction, written evidence of something done, or document, considered as either concerning or interesting the public, affording notice or information
    to the public, or open to public inspection. Keefe v. Donnell, 92 Me. 151, 42 A. 345; Colnon v. Orr, 71 Cal. 43, 11 P. 814.

    SUPREME COURT RULING – NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN
    Supreme Court of the United States 1795, “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54),

    All definitions are from Black’s Law 4th Edition, 1968; download a copy and DO NOT just assume that one knows what a word is.
    2015.10 Nomocracy ver II – UZA

    IS THIS TOO CRYPTIC OR CAN YOU ALREADY SEE IT? Hope this helped; be blessed, in peace – uza

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s