|
|
~ Dr. Franklin Lamb |
It depends whether the miscreant enjoys “We will always have your back regardless”…. status
Franklin Lamb Beirut On March 6, 2012, the US Congressional Research Service released a report to the US Congress concerning Restrictions on the use of American weapons by recipient countries. For those who have followed the subject there was not a whole lot new in the CRS study, yet it is instructive in identifying Israel once again as far and away the most consistent egregious violator of virtually every provision of every US law which purports to regulate how American weapons are used. In accordance with American law, the U.S. Government is mandated to enforce strict conditions on the use against civilians, of weapons it transfers to foreign recipients.
Violations of these conditions can lead to the suspension of deliveries or termination of contracts for such defense items, and even the cutting off of all aid to the violating country. Section 3(a) of the 1976 US Arms Export Control Act (AECA) sets the standards for countries to be eligible to receive American arms and it also sets express conditions on the uses to which these arms may be put. Section 4 of the AECA states that U.S. weapons shall be sold to friendly countries “solely” for use in “legitimate self-defense, for use in “internal security,” and to enable the recipient country to participate in “collective measures requested by the United Nations for the purpose of maintaining or restoring international peace and security.” Should the President or Congress determine pursuant to section 3(c)(3)(A) of the Arms Export Control Act that a “substantial violation” by a foreign country of an applicable agreement governing an arms sale or grant has occurred, then that country is automatically ineligible for further U.S. military hardware. This action would also terminate provision of credits, loan guarantees, cash sales, and deliveries pursuant to previous sales or grants. Other options include suspension of deliveries of defense items already ordered and refusal to allow new arms orders.
The United States has only once used such an option against Israel. Questions raised by researchers in Beirut during the summer of 1982 and by Washington Post journalist Jonathan Randel regarding the use of U.S.-supplied military equipment by Israel in Lebanon in June and July 1982, led the Reagan Administration to determine on July 15, 1982, that Israel “may” have violated its July 23, 1952, Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement with the United States (TIAS 2675) and the AECA. The pertinent language of the 1952 agreement between Israel and the United States states:
“The Government of Israel assures the United States Government that such equipment, material, or services as may be acquired from the United States … are required for and will be used solely to maintain its internal security, its legitimate self-defense, or to permit it to participate in the defense of the area of which it is a part, or in United Nations collective security arrangements and measures, and that it will not undertake any act of aggression against any other state.”
The House Foreign Affairs Committee held hearings on this issue in July and August 1982. On July 19, 1982, the Reagan Administration announced that it would prohibit new exports of cluster bombs to Israel. This prohibition was lifted by the Reagan Administration in November 1988 under US Israel lobby pressure on the White House designed to assist the Presidential campaign of George H. W. Bush against Senator Walter Mondale.
The facts of this case which manly centered on events in Lebanon are instructive. During the 1973 Ramadan war, Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir, watching Arab forces advance on Israel troops following the October 6 Egyptian and Syrian offensive, and being advised by the Israeli Defense Ministry of a pending disaster, threatened President Nixon with Israel using nuclear weapons unless the US rescued Israel. Nixon’s immediate response was to order a massive air lift to Israel of US arms stockpiled for use in Vietnam at Clark air force base near Subic Bay, Philippines.
The base commander at Clark immediately resigned because being on the defensive in Vietnam, US troops he advised Washington needed those weapons. Included were eight types of US cluster bombs including the M-42, M-46,CBU-58 A/B, APAM (BLU) 77/B, MK 20 “Rockeye”, MK 118 and he M-43 “Birdie” as the U.S. Marines in Beirut referred it in late 1982 and 1983. During a late June 1982 meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Begin, Reagan was handed a note from George Shultz. Based on the information he had in hand, Reagan directly told Begin that the US had reliable information than Israel was using American weapons against civilians in Lebanon. At this point according to Reagan, Begin became very agitated. He lowered his glasses and while glaring at Reagan and shaking his index finger said, “Mr. President, Israel has never and would never use American weapons against civilians and to claim otherwise is a blood libel against every Jew, everywhere.” Following their meeting Reagan told Defense Secretary Casper Weinberger, as reported by Weinberger and by various biographers of Reagan that “I did not know what the term “blood libel” meant, but I know that the man looked me straight in the eyes and lied to me.”
The original Secretary of State George Schultz suggestion to Reagan of Israel using two types (the M-42 and the CBU-58) of American cluster bombs was soon changed to the charge that Israel in fact used all eight types of American cluster bombs Nixon had sent to Meir.
Proof of the use of the eight types of US cluster bombs was delivered to an assembly of US Pentagon and other officials in late July 1982 at the Indian Head Ordnance facility on the Potomac River in Southern Maryland on instructions from the late American Journalist Janet Lee Stevens to this observer. Substantive and still preserved demonstrative and physical evidence, including photographs and US cluster bombs some of which still were filled with the high explosive minol, that were carried in my suitcase, (at least a ten year sentence in the Feds one imagines if done these days even in the then ignorance of possible ignition) that had been gathered from around West Beirut by Janet and her research team that included Palestinian fighters delegated by Yassir Arafat and Khalil al Wazir (Abu Jihad), some Marabatoun fighters, Amal, as well as this observer, to aid with the task, The US Zionist lobby accurately considers American arms control laws as meaningless. The prohibitions against Israel’s use of American weapons against civilians have not, are not and in all likelihood will never be enforced against Israel given the regimes continuing occupation of much of the US government. The once cherished American value of building a nation based on humane laws and the American national security interest of achieving a foreign policy that deals on the basis of equality with other nations have been sacrificed so as to delay the inevitable collapse of the apartheid colonial enterprise implanted on Palestine. The Obama “we’ve got your back regardless” genuflection endangers America as surely as it threatens with US weapons, every capitol in the Middle East and beyond that may even contemplate challenging Zionism’s regional hegemony. It’s high time for true American patriots to take back their country and rejoin the community of nations on the basis of equality and mutual respect for all, entangling and corruptive alliances with none.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
How is it that these barbarous acts by Israel can be known and documented and still not affect US policy and support of Israel especially given that such support entails US abducation of it’s UN responsibilites toward Palestinians including those Palestinians in Lebanon. It leaves the mind reeling. Thank you for bringing such very important work to forefront.
LikeLike
Easy – ignorance/apathy of too many American sh*tizens to the fact that their Govt’s occupied and hijacked by banksters, neocons and, above all, zionists.
Time to wake up!
LikeLike
“Useful idiots” is the term used by Lenin in referring to dupes within the free world, whose anti-war sentiments are exploited by enemies of freedom.
Israel’s incusions into Lebanon (1982 and 2006) were prompted by unrestrained attacks from Lebanon by the PLO and Hezzbolah respectively. Both of these insurgent entities within Lebanon violated international law by both attacking Israeli civilians with rocket/mortar barrages and using civilians as human shields. Hiding among civilians and launching attacks from within Christian neighborhoods in Lebanon, serve to both restrain Israel counterattacks as well as granting the Islamist insurgents an apparant propoganda point when Israel does respond. The personal testimony of Brigite Gabriel, a Lebonese Christian whose home was destroyed and whose family suffered due to this strategy implemented by the PLO.
Israel’s objective in uprooting anti-Israel Islamist insurgency is not murdering civilians, no more than America’s invasion of Normandy had the objective of killing French citizens. It is a fact, that more French civilians lost their lives in June 1944, than allied and German casualties combined!
Yes, Mr. Lamb, it is indeed time to wake up, before you find yourself living under Sharia law in at best a dhimmi state! I agree that America has been hijacked, but most recently by an administration whose foreign policy seems to be directed toward a destabalization of the Middle East with a goal of the establishment of a Sunni caliphate under Muslim Brotherhood leadership, perhaps with Turkey as its epicenter, ala the Ottoman Empire!
LikeLike
That’s nearly convincing – not! LOL!
Any neutral visitor to the ziocolony can witness the barbarity of blanket policies of racial discrimination and ruthless apartheid in action to this very day as Israel hastens its own demise by its own paranoid, disproportional hand whilst the whole world’s citizenry looks on aghast!
Why?
Because, just like with nazism, the time for stupidly appeasing zionists is over.
And just like with apartheid, elected serpents will soon have no choice but to reflect the will and voice of the people to stamp out tribalism and racism for universal values and equality of opportunity for all.
Make no mistake Zioland’s days are numbered and no amount of blackmail or bribery can reverse this.
LikeLike
Pingback: Exposing Zionism and Israel: A Definitive Guide | Talesfromthelou
Pingback: Exposing Zionism and Israel: A Definitive Guide - Some Next Level Shit
Pingback: Exposing Zionism and Israel: A Definitive Guide | LVX
Pingback: Exposing Zionism and Israel: A Definitive Guide – Brutal Proof